Keith Vaz 'paid For Male Escorts', Sunday Mirror Claims So What?

[SleazyMichael]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37269919

what I don't get is that the escorts only charged £75 & £45 - if fact - they are seriously undercharging!

[SleazyMichael]

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/05/keith-vazs-charity-links-to-rent-boy-scandal-as-mp-faces-investi/

Well of course she would - this bitch is no friend of the sex industry!

[James]

It's not unheard of for tabloid newspapers to place fake adverts or to recruit SWs to entrap high-profile customers.

What surprises me in this instance is the lack of respect he had towards the escorts and how foolish he was to deal with any escort who would charge these rates.

[TobyFoxx]

Has anyone experienced any fall-out from this? E.g. greater caution or concern from clients, or any notable fall in business? 

[Ben Manchester]

On 9/9/2016 at 5:20 PM, TobyFoxx said:

Has anyone experienced any fall-out from this? E.g. greater caution or concern from clients, or any notable fall in business? 

Generally, tabloid scandals don't appear to affect work levels. I think this is because most customers are not in the public eye and aren't subject to newspaper interest.

[SkinTrade]

On 9/5/2016 at 8:44 PM, SleazyMichael said:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37269919

what I don't get is that the escorts only charged £75 & £45 - if fact - they are seriously undercharging!

There was an anti-prostitution/radical feminist person on Sky News who turned her knowledge of "the going rate" into "exploitation of vulnerable young men"! - plus the fact the guys involved were apparently Polish, 

 

I've not noticed any fall in business, although this time of year it starts to pick up again after a quiet summer.